Submit! Submit!

“Publication–is the Auction / Of the Mind of Man–”

-Emily Dickinson

Not a happy camper.I must admit I have a bit of a love-hate relationship with sending out poems to awards and periodicals. Actually, that’s not true. It’s more of a hate-hate relationship. The difficulty lies on two fronts: practical and psychological. So, this weekend, determined to let a few more poems from my manuscript finally have a chance at seeing the light of day, I enlisted my wife’s help. She, after all, sees nothing unusual about sending poems she likes to journals with a similar sensibility, and waiting patiently for the reply. After all, they are not her poems.

For me, it’s been a morass of spreadsheets and angst. Though otherwise detail-oriented, I found rounding up the information necessary to send off poems akin to a multivariable calculus exam. You see, the mind-games and doubt have somehow transformed a mildly laborious process into something Kafkaesque. So, making the process simple and methodical has been a key for me to stick with it. Poems, after all, don’t publish themselves.

My process involves maintaining spreadsheets: of poems I have already sent out, when, to whom; and of journals that might like my work. I have recently taken to rating them by the degree to which I think the sensibilities of the periodical might match my own, and by my perception of their reputability. So, then I sort the list (sensibility first, reputability second), and ratchet down one by one, checking submission periods, guidelines, and the number and format of poems to send.

For choosing the poems, I pick from a folder on my computer of poems I both think are done, and are worth publishing. I have a a single, huge document full of continuous writing, and a separate folder with individual files of single poems from that document with which I would like to tinker before declaring them done. Once done, if they’re good, they make it either to a place I call “fossils” (i.e. stuff I might mine later, but not worth publishing) or the to-publish folder I mentioned above. Once the to-publish folder starts looking really full, a combined sense of guilt and duty prompts me to submit a few poems.

This is my method. I have tried to make it as simple as possible so that, like the tasks assigned to astronauts waddling through the vacuum of space, the procedures are so methodical and well-rehearsed that I can execute them even when gazing into the yawning black void. I’d love to know what other people do, what works–both practically and psychologically–to keep putting work out there for consideration. Do you view it as a necessary evil? A pleasant delight? Do you have some other system that really works?

Like it or not, in the end, sending out poems is a part of the process. Making that process bonehead-simple, and doing it even (sometimes especially) when I would rather, instead, be writing a new poem or, better yet, wasting time on Facebook, is an exercise in detachment, perseverance, and yes, you guessed it, continuing to hope.

Similar Articles:

  1. Jekyll and Hyde and Publishing
  2. The Likelihood of Hope
  3. Writing Tip: Getting in the Mood Poetically

Liked this? Receive new ones in your inbox.

(You can unsubscribe any time.)


  • http://gingatao.wordpress.com/ Paul Squires

    What a great post. I agree that your approach is one of the most sensible and organised I have seen. I have no idea how you manage to be so organised, perhaps you don’t drink? Did Kafka, I can’t remember. But this piece about process is wonderfully written so I’m sure you’ll succeed.

  • Robert

    Thanks, Paul! Most kind.

  • http://alejandroescude.blogspot.com Alex Escude

    I had a system down, then I had a baby and I started working on a teaching credential and it all came apart. Now, I scan the poet’s market, find a likely candidate and submit four solid (ready to go) pieces and a risky (maybe they’ll like this wild stuff) one. You’re method surely works better.

  • Robert

    Thanks for chiming in, Alex. I like the “four solid” and one “risky” approach. I often wonder what to do with my more “risky” poems. I think that’s a nice way to make sure they get a chance.

  • Michelle Bitting

    Robert,

    The more i write, the less i submit, weirdly enough. I suppose I should be submitting way more, but am so much more enthralled with writing than submitting that i now have to remind myself to periodically make the effort. I try to have work out to three or four journals at a time–a variety of pieces. When it narrows down to having poems out to only one or two magazines, i send to a few more. I’ve gotten horribly lazy about submitting to places that don’t take electronic subs, and i need to work on that. The entire process is one i approach in fits and bursts as intuition moves me. Acceptance/rejection is not a big deal anymore, which is both sad (loss of innocence?) and great (no more emotional rollercoastering). Part of me would like to not submit for a very long time–wait and see where my work ends up, say, after a year of writing, but then, publication is essential for a lot for the grant and prize eligibility so i keep at it. The weaker work either never gets sent or is not accepted and weeds its way out of the treasure chest of keepers. Wow, time to shut up and write! xo M

  • http://faerye.net Felicity Shoulders

    Since I’m a fictionist, things are very different. For one thing, though I know other folks are more prolific, my spreadsheet of works only has 25 stories and microfics on it, with just 14 ‘finished’ (green for submittable, blue for submitted, purple for accepted). That’s pretty much my system: color-coding for current status, wordcount next to that for reference, then where I’ve sent it when and what they said. I also keep track on a separate sheet of who has read and commented on each story and when. I also use duotrope, so there’s a bit of redundancy.

    I never thought of keeping a spreadsheet of potential markets. I favorite places on duotrope and keep a nebulous feeling in my brain about the aesthetic of each magazine. That’s a big issue for me, because so much of my stuff recently has been interstitial and there aren’t all that many markets that feel like excellent matches. I operate partially on guilt — with so few stories and some long turnaround times, I’m really putting Future Felicity at a disadvantage by NOT sending out — and partially on excitement. As one of my advisors told me, having at least one thing out does maintain “drama in the daily trip to the mailbox”.

  • Robert

    I’ve noticed similar trends myself–about feeling more neutral, and with it somehow disappointed, and, of course, wanting to hole up and write without submitting for awhile. One difference, though–I’ve only recently discovered places that take electronic subs., and am loving the ease, but also somehow more nervous than when I used to always send in paper. We change, and our rituals change. Fortunately, the writing goes on!

  • Robert

    It’s true writers have a different relationship to their mailbox than “normal” people. I never thought about the thousands of others who share my own neurotic relationship to mail. I guess that’s just one more bonus of being in touch with fellow writers through this blog. Thanks for your thoughts, Felicity. You’ll be missed at the upcoming residency.

  • http://www.webbish6.com Jeannine Hall Gailey

    I used to use the Writer’s Market submissions tracker, but I haven’t used it in a year or two. Right now I have a spreadsheet of poems, with columns for where it’s currently submitted, whether or not the place takes simultaneous submissions, and when a poem gets published, I have a separate list for where it was published (because it is too easy to lose track of which thing was published where…especially in a world of disappearing web mag archives.)
    I definitely don’t enjoy submitting, and would love to live in a world where so many places were soliciting work from me I didn’t have to worry about it. Unfortunately, not there yet, so I have friends who give me goals to hit (three subs before the end of the year! Try sending to the New Yorker, or Slate! etc – they’re kind of random, but keep me on my toes.) I also consult Poet’s Market, read as many lit mags as I can get my hands on, and try to keep track of where writers I like (whose writing is somewhat like mine) publish, so I can try those places.
    It’s my goal to have all my finished work out somewhere all the time. Alas, that’s rarely the case.

  • Robert

    Thanks, Jeannine. I like the idea of issuing oneself (directly or via friends) a challenge or stretch goal with regard to sending work out.

  • http://birthdaysofpoets.blogspot.com Andy Christ

    I agree, nice post Robert. I also used a spreadsheet to keep track of my submissions. I found it helped a lot to subscribe to Allison Joseph’s blast of calls for submissions. It drastically reduced the turnaround time for notification of acceptance/rejection.

  • Robert

    Hi Andy,

    Thanks! I believe the list you’re referring to is the CRWROPPS-B list:

    http://www.poetryresourcepage.com/resources/crwropps.html

    Fantastic resource!

    Cheers,
    Robert