Sunday, September 9. 2007
Henri Cole's Best of Both Worlds
Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
This is a good illustration of the effective use of indented line breaks.
Charles Olson, Lawrence Ferlinghetti, Robert Duncan, Gregory Corso, Frank O’Hara, Paul Blackburn (to name a few) are similarly effective practitioners, with whom you could do similar analyses. Funny how this and similar techniques have fallen out of style. Not with me, maybe not with you, but with lit magazines & such. It’s relatively uncommon now in these peculiarly "correct" (yet crazy) times to see that kind of thing, and I get the feeling that if you’re too extravagant in your use of indented line breaks and variable margins, you might just be labeled as a "wild man". And yet to me the page as visual field and reflection of pause and voice is a dimension to be taken advantage of, and I enjoy it when it is taken advantage of fully and effectively.
Charles Olson, Lawrence Ferlinghetti, Robert Duncan, Gregory Corso, Frank O’Hara, Paul Blackburn (to name a few) are similarly effective practitioners, with whom you could do similar analyses. Funny how this and similar techniques have fallen out of style. Not with me, maybe not with you, but with lit magazines & such. It’s relatively uncommon now in these peculiarly "correct" (yet crazy) times to see that kind of thing, and I get the feeling that if you’re too extravagant in your use of indented line breaks and variable margins, you might just be labeled as a "wild man". And yet to me the page as visual field and reflection of pause and voice is a dimension to be taken advantage of, and I enjoy it when it is taken advantage of fully and effectively.
I think certain techniques are somehow more risky than others, somehow more likely to get you labeled, as you say, a "wild man" if you don’t pull it off. Indented lines are one such technique - possibly due to the abundance of beginning poets who first discover they can put line breaks into any old piece of writing to make it more "poetic" and second discover that they can indent lines to make it even more so. The truth is every tactic must serve in a balanced and deliberate relationship to the form - and indented lines are no exception.
As for the poem itself, I like the glassblower/flame image, but I wonder who’s more innocent, the poet or Buddha? Substitute Jesus or Ghandi, and you’ll see how presumptuous that line is.
I suppose the choice of Buddha implies a nod to Asian literature. The image of tears "shivering and steaming like a horse in rain" certainly strike me as the kind of line Ezra Pound learned to craft from studying Asian literature, culminating in his "petals on a wet, black bough." So, I suppose I could defend it as not arbitrary in that way - or at least, as tricking us into appearing proper on first blush due to its surroundings. You’re right, though - the moment you push on that statement, it crumples up as presumptuous. I would argue that getting away with it not standing out on first read is something close to the heart of poetic deception.





