Kindling Controversy

E-books are harder to burn...

I asked for an Amazon Kindle for my birthday. Like Ebenezer Scrooge in “A Christmas Carol,” I have been haunted ever since. In my dreams, I visit the destitute families of the former owners of small, independent book stores. The youngest, a cripple, gives thanks before a paltry meal, declaring, “God bless us, every one–even that mean old Mr. Peake, the last person on Earth we thought would betray the printed book!” I wake in a sweat.

And yet, it is precisely because I love literature that I decided to try buying it digitally. None of the typical reasons for e-books really tipped me over the edge. Nor did the counter-arguments counteract the most compelling reason I have to take the plunge. Our small cottage is lined with book shelves. We moved five times in five years during the U.S. housing boom, when landlord after landlord decided to sell at the end of our one-year lease. That meant schlepping dozens of bankers boxes full of books–heavy books!–from one home to the next.

As a teenager, I watched “Brother Sun, Sister Moon” repeatedly. This 1970s Zeffirelli bio pic of St. Francis, complete with a soundtrack by Donovan, features the overacting of Graham Faulkner as the crusader-turned-saint. The scene that stayed with me is the moment of Francis’ enlightenment, when he strips naked and begins flinging his worldly possessions–and those of his rich father–out the window, into the arms of a receptive crowd of peasants below. That’s pretty much how I left college (though I kept my clothes.) And, while I miss my record collection (and my parents could have used the futon), the idea of simplifying my possessions–if not to enlighten myself, at least to lighten my stance–remains compelling.

And so, far from an argument against books, I have convinced myself that I love books so much, I want to (easily) take them with me wherever I go. My English wife tells me one of her greatest regrets about emigrating to America was leaving behind reams of piano sheet music. We are now investigating the feasibility of an iPad as a music-reading device. To me, just about everything else in the e-books-versus-real-books debate is a wash–you save a few trees, but perpetuate the hazardous metals in e-waste (and not just in the reading device, but in the “cloud” that supports it); you can search and share, but give up the real-world feel of books; you accelerate the demise of indie book shops at the same time you usher in a new era of ubiquitous accessibility to literature.

In short, it seems less a question of “whether” I would go digital, but more accurately “when?” In pursuit of simplicity and freedom, that time is now. Friends and family chipped in, and the new Kindle, appropriately colored black like my heart, is now on back order. I may hate the thing. But I doubt it. Like any new development in literature, I approach the Kindle with an open mind. And to those who think I should do otherwise, I say, “humbug.”

Liked this? Receive new ones in your inbox.

(You can unsubscribe any time.)


  • John

    Keep us posted. The more I think I should try a Kindle-type device, the more I think of ways that my reading experience is a physical involvement with the books — sight, smell, touch, sound. Wouldn’t I lose a big part of the experience on a Kindle? Maybe. But maybe there is a an opportunity for my associative brain to have a larger library at my fingertips. And the digital pages turning wouldn’t disturb my wife when I’m reading in bed.

  • http://www.robertpeake.com/ Robert Peake

    Happy to let you try it out for yourself when it arrives, John.

  • Richard Beban

    The iPad (yes, that iPad) also allows you to download Amazon’s free Kindle software and buy books from Amazon that way. The Apple bookstore app doesn’t have such a great selection of books yet, so I read most of my “guilty pleasure” detective fiction on the iPad using the Kindle software. Yeats had the same guilty pleasure, so I don’t feel too bad.

    The advantage of the iPad, of course, being that it does so much more than the single-minded Kindle. You can still cancel your Kindle order.

    I, too, feel sorry about losing independent bookstores, but the electronic convenience and storage capacity both outweigh the pain.

  • http://lovesgoodfood.com/jason/ Jason Riedy

    My opposition to the Kindle and the Nook have nothing to do with e-books or the format intrinsically. It’s about control. Who controls these devices? Can you make any changes? Can you, say, decide to open it up and hook it up to a traditional monitor? Can you say when Amazon/B&N/whoever cannot access \your\ device to change things?

    A useful (and wearing its bias on its sleave) science fiction piece about the ethics concerned, from 1997: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html

  • http://www.robertpeake.com/ Robert Peake

    Jason, as a fellow fan of open source, I heed your concern that proprietary readers don’t go far enough. But isn’t paper the ultimate in proprietary? A single instance of ink on pages, subject to physical decay? My hope is that democracies will begin to regulate literature distributors and, who knows? maybe libraries themselves will go digital one day.

    Richard, I love the iPad. And you know how my wife feels about it. :) But a backlit screen just isn’t the same as digital ink. I’ve heard rumors Apple patented a dual screen (digital ink overlaying full-color). Now that, if it develops, will be enticing…

  • http://lovesgoodfood.com/jason/ Jason Riedy

    I prefer the term “free software” over “open source” for software ( http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.html ). And paper cannot be retroactively erased. You cannot be denied the ability to read text printed on paper. Except by time and nature, which is somewhat mitigated by acid-free paper. Mitigated at least as well as the decay of digital formats and readers. That’s another aspect: the format and DRM (digital restrictions management) of Nook and Kindle books makes preservation over time tricky, at least in the US.

    Restoring the public domain and ensuring works are accessible once they enter the public domain would go far for guaranteeing access by people. Libraries would play the crucial role in preservation, much as monasteries during the middle ages.

  • Robert

    Jason, the prospect of corporate censorship makes for great sci-fi, but I’m just not too worried about it in practice. Consumers have more might than ever before thanks to the same technologies that make digital distribution possible. Plus, the literary marketplace itself is plenty insidious in the ways in which it censors works. For-profit distributors are the least of our worries, I think, in that regard. And hopefully demand in the economic marketplace will spur on benevolent institutions capable of archiving for posterity. With the redundancy that’s now possible through globally-distributed cloud storage, we’re unlikely to get as close to losing major works as we did in the Dark Ages. That’s why I say e-books are harder to burn.

  • http://lovesgoodfood.com/jason/ Jason Riedy
  • Robert

    Thanks, Jason. Seems like just the kind of PR mess they’ll be highly motivated to avoid in the future. But we’ll see…

  • http://juliemusil.blogspot.com Julie Musil

    I still don’t have a digital reader. I’m sure I will some day, but for now, I still enjoy books with pages. Enjoy your new toy!

  • http://midnightfire.blogspot.com/ Amos Keppler

    Even teenagers I know prefer holding a book in their hands while reading. Hopefully they will always be able to.

  • Robert

    Apparently Nobel-Prize-winner Günter Graß doesn’t much like e-reading (or e-writing, for that matter) either:

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/0,1518,712715-2,00.html

  • Pingback: blog.rightreading.com » Links for 27 August

  • http://sonshinemusic.blogspot.com Rebecca T.

    I own a Sony Reader. Fell in love with it whilst working at a bookstore. My room is overflowing with paper books and I can’t see myself never buying a book in paper format, but the accessibility and portability of the Reader sold me on it. For example, I just went on vacation and was able to take 15 books with me to fit my mood rather than the 5 max I would want to lug in paper format. Of course, having a digital copy doesn’t mean I don’t also own a hard copy. Most recently – had pre-ordered MockingJay, but it was late. So I bought it for my Reader. I now have 2 copies in 2 formats. The publishers got twice their money out of me :D

  • Robert

    Thanks, Rebecca. Never considered the double-income-for-writers implications. But I may be supporting just that once it arrives.